Steering clear of 3 common pitfalls in data analysis

Data analysis has never been more powerful. With advancements in AI, data analysis can now be automated, effortlessly visualized, performed in real-time on large and complex datasets, and used to make future predictions. Through natural language processing, AI can now even interpret human language data, extracting valuable insights from textual data sources. However, even the most sophisticated machine learning algorithms require their users, humans, to have a basic understanding of data analysis to identify relevant data sources, prepare data, define and frame the right problem for AI to solve, evaluate the outputs of AI models, and, most importantly, make informed decisions based on AI insights. 

Below, we explore three common pitfalls in data analysis that we have observed in our work with clients across various stages of business maturity, industries, and geographies. With so much potential at your fingertips, don’t let these pitfalls become your Achilles' heel.

Pitfall #1:  Navigating the Seas of Unfocused Analysis

Let's leave behind Achilles and his unfortunate heel and move ahead in time to Seneca, the famous Roman Stoic, who said, "No wind blows in favor of a ship without direction." In our context, this means that no amount of fancy data dashboards, complicated spreadsheets, or detailed KPI tables will get your business anywhere if you don’t know what exactly you are trying to measure and why. Winning businesses focus on a set of key metrics they continuously monitor, using additional data analysis to validate observed trends and hypotheses. For example, a real estate developer might continuously monitor key market and economic metrics, such as price indexes and interest rates, with a system for flagging early warning signs.

Suppose the developer notices they are losing young clientele and suspects it’s due to a perceived lack of sustainability solutions in their properties. They can use targeted data analysis to validate this hypothesis and run experiments with content marketing to see whether a sustainability narrative generates more interest and engagement. If the data confirms their suspicion, they can then double down on promoting sustainability features to attract and retain younger clients. On the contrary, a suboptimal approach would be collecting vast amounts of data on things young clients may like—such as general demographic information or popular trends—without understanding how it relates to the specific problem at hand, resulting in wasted resources and confusion.

Pitfall #2: Drifting in Unquestioned Success

Let’s face it—we all love to see our business outcomes on the rise, whether it's contracts signed, successful negotiations, or improved employee satisfaction scores, while costs trend downward. The problem arises when we embrace positive outcomes without scrutinizing them as rigorously as we do negative ones. Often, we may overlook warning signs lurking behind these seemingly positive results.

First and foremost, it's essential to consider your performance relative to the market. Sure, you may have secured higher contract prices, but are these increases merely keeping pace with inflation? If your sales are climbing, are they outpacing the market average, or are your competitors seeing similar or greater growth? Falling behind the market growth rate could signal increased competition or shifting consumer preferences, potentially eroding your market share. Recognizing these trends demands proactive measures rather than complacency in the face of apparent growth.

Furthermore, there's the internal comparison to consider. Suppose you review your performance between quarters and celebrate cost optimizations and enhanced employee satisfaction. But what if those cost reductions are temporary due to favorable currency fluctuations, and employee morale is buoyed by one-time bonuses? These improvements may be short-lived or unsustainable. It's crucial to analyze your performance over time, comparing quarters across multiple years and noting any significant anomalies, such as major marketing campaigns or exceptional employee benefits. By recognizing and accounting for these factors, you can better distinguish between sustainable improvements and transient fluctuations, guiding more informed decision-making for long-term success.

Pitfall #3: Neglecting Segment Insights

Many businesses can significantly benefit from segment analysis, as it can reveal insights that a holistic view may obscure. While it's common for companies to analyze performance by product line, segmenting revenue or costs can also be based on various other factors such as geography, department, customer demographics, or usage patterns. For instance, a company might discover that its profit margins are suffering because physical retail stores incur high rental and staffing costs, whereas online sales channels have a much lower cost-to-revenue ratio. In this case, the company could shift resources to enhance its online presence, close underperforming physical stores, and potentially convert some locations into distribution centers to support online sales.

Effective segmentation of business revenue or costs must align with the organization's strategic objectives. Take, for example, a healthy snacks company that segments its revenue by product lines but overlooks its growth strategy focused on expanding sales among office workers, the demographic with the fastest expected growth rate. Segmentation by product lines alone might not reveal which distribution channels or products are favored by this target demographic, leading to missed opportunities.

Additionally, it's crucial to allocate shared or overhead costs accurately among different segments. Allocating overhead based solely on revenue or headcount without considering actual resource usage can lead to misleading cost allocations and inaccurate profitability calculations. For example, products that require more indirect resources like quality control and setup time in their manufacturing process should not be treated equally with simpler products when allocating overhead. Otherwise, simple, high-margin products might appear less profitable, while complex, low-margin products might seem more profitable than they truly are.

Remember, data is only as powerful as the insights it uncovers. Steer clear of these pitfalls and pave the way for more informed, effective decision-making.


Mohamad Al Husseini & Greta Gerazimaite

Mohamad Al Husseini is the Founder and Managing Director of Quasar, a boutique strategy consultancy specializing in strategic training programs and expert fundraising support. With a decade of experience in the management consulting industry, Mohamad has led innovation-centric projects and thought leadership initiatives across diverse industries in the Middle East. He holds a Master of Engineering from Télécom ParisTech and an MBA from INSEAD, both earned with distinction.

Greta Gerazimaite is the Co-Founder of Quasar and an experienced strategist and operator. She began her career in the pharma and real estate industries before moving into consulting with Bain & Company, where she tackled client challenges within the Corporate and Private Equity Groups. Greta then embarked on an independent path, focusing on working with venture capitalists and startups in the US, Europe, and the Middle East. She holds an MBA with distinction from Harvard Business School.

Previous
Previous

Cracking the code: Why scalable businesses attract investors

Next
Next

Startup wars: the pitch deck awakens